Rivista di formazione e aggiornamento professionale del pediatra e del medico di base, fondata nel 1982. In collaborazione con l'Associazione Culturale Pediatri.
Login Abbonamenti Pubblicazioni Carrello Registrazione Perché registrarsi? Contatti

Aggiornamento

L’EBV e il paradosso dell’infezione precoce: protezione o rischio?

EBV and the paradox OF early infettino: protection or risk?

Tommasini A.

Aprile 2026 - pagg. 225 -230 | DOI: 10.53126/MEB45225

Abstract
The Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is one of the most fascinating paradoxes of modern medicine: a nearly ubiquitous pathogen that in most cases causes benign infections, but it may be lethal in individuals with specific genetic vulnerabilities and, in a fraction of apparently healthy subjects, may trigger devastating autoimmune diseases many years later. In recent years, epidemiological studies of extraordinary scope and mechanistic research of great elegance have revolutionised the understanding of how, when and why EBV becomes pathogenic. The article reviews the classical knowledge about infectious mononucleosis and integrates it with the most recent discoveries, which tell a story of timing, genetics and immunological misfortune that culminates in an apparently paradoxical provocation: in the absence of vaccines, might it be better for children to encounter this virus when they are ‘young’ rather than when they are ‘older’?
Riassunto
Il virus di Epstein-Barr (EBV) rappresenta uno dei più affascinanti paradossi della medicina moderna: un patogeno quasi ubiquitario che nella maggior parte dei casi causa infezioni benigne, ma che può essere letale in individui con specifiche vulnerabilità genetiche e, in una frazione di soggetti apparentemente sani, può innescare a distanza di molti anni malattie autoimmuni devastanti. Negli ultimi anni, studi epidemiologici di straordinaria ampiezza e ricerche meccanicistiche di grande eleganza hanno rivoluzionato la nostra comprensione di come, quando e perché l’EBV diventa patogeno. In questo articolo ripercorriamo le conoscenze classiche sulla mononucleosi infettiva e le integriamo con le scoperte più recenti, che ci raccontano una storia di timing, genetica e sfortuna immunologica. Una storia che culmina in una provocazione apparentemente paradossale: in assenza di vaccini, potrebbe essere meglio che i nostri bambini incontrino questo virus "da piccoli" piuttosto che "da grandi"?
Contenuto riservato

Per leggere l'articolo completo è necessario effettuare il login.

Non sei ancora registrato? Registrati

Bibliografia

1. Crawford DH. Biology and disease associations of Epstein-Barr virus. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2001;356(1408):461-73. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2000.0783. 2. Dunmire SK, Verghese PS, Balfour HH Jr. Primary Epstein-Barr virus infection. J Clin Virol 2018;102:84-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2018. 03.001. 3. Luzuriaga K, Sullivan JL. Infectious mononucleosis. N Engl J Med 2010;362(21):1993-2000. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1001116. 4. Chêne A, Donati D, Guerreiro-Cacais AO, et al. A molecular link between malaria and Epstein-Barr virus reactivation. PLoS Pathog 2007;3(6):e80. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat. 0030080. 5. Wu Y, Ma S, Zhang L, et al. Clinical manifestations and laboratory results of 61 children with infectious mononucleosis. J Int Med Res 2020;48(10):300060520924550. doi: 10.1177/0300060520924550. 6. Wu D, Wang J, Zeng Q, Wang L, Lv X. Epidemiological characteristics of Epstein-Barr virus infection in children and distribution of disease spectrum in hospitalized patients in shandong province. J Med Virol 2024;96 (3):e29561. doi: 10.1002/jmv.29561. 7. Damania B, Kenney SC, Raab-Traub N. Epstein-Barr virus: Biology and clinical disease. Cell 2022;185(20):3652-70. doi: 10.1016/ j.cell.2022.08.026. 8. Levitskaya J, Coram M, Levitsky V, et al. Inhibition of antigen processing by the internal repeat region of the Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen-1. Nature 1995;375(6533): 685-8. doi: 10.1038/375685a0. 9. Latour S, Fischer A. Signaling pathways involved in the T-cell-mediated immunity against Epstein-Barr virus: Lessons from genetic diseases. Immunol Rev 2019;291(1): 174-89. doi: 10.1111/imr.12791. 10. Latour S. Human Immune Responses to Epstein-Barr Virus Highlighted by Immunodeficiencies. Annu Rev Immunol 2025;43(1): 723-49. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-082323-035455. 11. Tangye SG. Genetic susceptibility to EBV infection: insights from inborn errors of immunity. Hum Genet 2020;139(6-7):885-901. doi: 10.1007/s00439-020-02145-3. 12. Fournier B, Latour S. Primary Immunodeficiencies and EBV-Associated Diseases. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2025 Aug 13. doi: 10.1007/82_2025_316. 13. Tangye SG, Al-Herz W, Bousfiha A, et al. Human Inborn Errors of Immunity: 2022 Update on the Classification from the International Union of Immunological Societies Expert Committee. J Clin Immunol 2022;42(7):1473-507. doi: 10.1007/s10875-022-01289-3. 14. Raymond LS, Leiding J, Forbes-Satter LR. Diagnostic Modalities in Primary Immunodeficiency. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2022;63 (1):90-8. doi: 10.1007/s12016-022-08933-1. 15. Bjornevik K, Cortese M, Healy BC, et al. Longitudinal analysis reveals high prevalence of Epstein-Barr virus associated with multiple sclerosis. Science 2022;375(6578):296-301. doi: 10.1126/science.abj8222. 16. Walton C, King R, Rechtman L, et al. Rising prevalence of multiple sclerosis worldwide: Insights from the Atlas of MS, third edition. Mult Scler 2020;26(14):1816-21. doi: 10.1177/1352458520970841. 17. Thacker EL, Mirzaei F, Ascherio A. Infectious mononucleosis and risk for multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis. Ann Neurol 2006; 59(3):499-503. doi: 10.1002/ana.20820. 18. Tantipraphat L, Sudhinaraset N, Thongmee T, et al. Epstein-Barr Virus Seroprevalence in Thailand: A Temporal and Global Perspective with Health Care and Economic Correlations. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2025;113 (1):86-93. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.24-0857. 19. Loosen SH, Doege C, Meuth SG, Luedde T, Kostev K, Roderburg C. Infectious mononucleosis is associated with an increased incidence of multiple sclerosis: Results from a cohort study of 32,116 outpatients in Germany. Front Immunol 2022;13:937583. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.937583. 20. Xu Y, Hiyoshi A, Smith KA, et al. Association of Infectious Mononucleosis in Childhood and Adolescence With Risk for a Subsequent Multiple Sclerosis Diagnosis Among Siblings. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4(10):e2124932. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.24932. 21. Coder BD, Wang H, Ruan L, Su DM. Thymic involution perturbs negative selection leading to autoreactive T cells that induce chronic inflammation. J Immunol 2015;194(12): 5825-37. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1500082.. 22. Younis S, Moutusy SI, Rasouli S, et al. Epstein-Barr virus reprograms autoreactive B cells as antigen-presenting cells in systemic lupus erythematosus. Sci Transl Med 2025;17(824):eady0210. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.ady0210. 23. Nyeo SS, Cumming EM, Burren OS, et al. Population-scale sequencing resolves determinants of persistent EBV DNA. Nature 2026;650(8102):664-72. doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-10020-2. 24. Wang J, Qiu Y, Marti Z, et al. EBV infection and HLA-DR15 jointly drive multiple sclerosis by myelin peptide presentation. Cell 2026;189(2):569-84.e14. doi: 10.1016/ j.cell.2025.12.046. 25. Monte G, Tiralongo G, Papetti L, et al. Complete Epstein-Barr virus seropositivity in a cohort of pediatric onset multiple sclerosis: a comparison to other autoimmune diseases. J Neurol 2025;272(11):735. doi: 10.1007/ s00415-025-13477-3. 26. Aloisi F, Giovannoni G, Salvetti M. Epstein-Barr virus as a cause of multiple sclerosis: opportunities for prevention and therapy. Lancet Neurol 2023;22(4):338-49. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00471-9.

Corrispondenza: alberto.tommasini@burlo.trieste.it